Supabase vs Convex
A side-by-side comparison from 86 GitHub-verified developers who shipped production code on both platforms.
Supabase wins on Postgres familiarity and SDK breadth; Convex wins on TypeScript-end-to-end DX and reactive query primitives. For TS-only teams Convex; for polyglot teams or SQL-native data Supabase.
Benchmark Comparison
| Metric | Supabase | Convex |
|---|---|---|
| Database model | Postgres (SQL) | Custom relational |
| TypeScript-end-to-end | No (multi-language SDK) | Yes (TS only) |
| Reactive queries | Subscriptions | Built-in |
| SDK languages | TS/Python/Dart/Swift/Kotlin | TypeScript only |
| Self-host option | Yes | No |
| Vendor lock-in | Low (standard Postgres) | Higher |
| Built-in scheduler/cron | Via pg_cron | Native |
| Pricing model | Tiered | Tiered |
Operational Verdicts
Convex's type inference flows from schema to React hooks without manual types. Refactor a field, the app shows compile errors everywhere. For TypeScript-only teams Convex's DX is genuinely ahead.
Supabase has SDKs for Swift, Kotlin, Dart, Python, Go. Convex is TypeScript-only. For teams with native mobile or non-JS backends, Supabase is the only option that works.
Supabase is standard Postgres — migrate to AWS RDS, Render, or self-host any time. Convex's data and execution model is proprietary; migration off is significant. For risk-averse teams Supabase wins.
Reviewer Voices
"Postgres is the moat."
"After 4 years on Firebase the join queries finally make sense."
"Reactive queries plus types is unreasonably good."
"Best DX in the BaaS category for TS teams."