Supabase vs Firebase
A side-by-side comparison from 117 GitHub-verified developers who shipped production code on both platforms.
Supabase wins on data model (Postgres) and self-host option; Firebase wins on mobile SDKs and realtime sync maturity. For mobile-first products Firebase; for everything else Supabase has caught up and pulled ahead.
Benchmark Comparison
| Metric | Supabase | Firebase |
|---|---|---|
| Database model | Postgres (SQL) | Firestore (NoSQL) |
| Mobile SDKs (iOS/Android) | Mature | Best-in-class |
| Realtime maturity | Strong | Best-in-class |
| Self-host option | Yes (OSS) | No |
| RLS / row-level security | Native | Rules language |
| Migration off platform | Standard Postgres | Genuinely painful |
| Auth providers | Major social + SAML | All major social |
| Free tier | 500MB | Generous Spark |
Operational Verdicts
Joins, indexes, foreign keys, transactions — all the reasons SQL exists. Firestore's document model forces denormalization. After 3 years on Firebase teams realize their data model has become unmaintainable.
Firebase's iOS/Android/Flutter SDKs are still the platform standard. Realtime sync, offline-first, push notifications all in one SDK. For mobile-primary apps the maturity gap with Supabase is real.
Supabase is open-source and self-hostable. Firebase has no equivalent path. For regulated industries or compliance-heavy customers, this is decisive.
Reviewer Voices
"The cohesive Postgres-on-edge platform."
"Postgres is the moat. Everything else is convenient packaging."
"Mobile-first BaaS still the default for a reason."
"Unity SDK is why I stay."